Decision-Making Begins When an Action Needs to Be Taken
Decision-making is a cognitive process leading to the selection of a course of action among alternatives. Whether an action or opinion, every decision making process produces a final choice.
The decision making process begins when an action needs to be taken, but one doesn’t know exactly what to do or where to begin. The reasoning process can be rational or irrational, with most decisions based on explicit or implied assumptions.
Building Block One: Applying The Principles of Decision Making
Judiciously applying specific decision making principles will more often than not make the difference between taking effective or ineffective action. These principles help ensure that all involved stay focused on their specific work-related duties as well as the overall objective the company is pursuing.
When it comes to effective decision making, paying close attention to the organizational universe is not optional, but critical. The attributes contributing to good decisions can translate directly into tangible benefits when applied to the broader framework of business-related operations. Each decision made should serve as a learning experience, whether or not it proves wise.
How is an effective decision made? Maintaining an understanding of the basic role of one’s organization can support thoughtful planning and processes for decision making objectives, which tend to justify the future course of the company.
There are 10 basic steps to follow when a decision has to be made. These include:
- Identify principles with which to judge the alternatives. What standards and judgment criteria should the solution meet?
- Gather information. What factors does the problem involve?
- Identify the purpose of the decision. What exactly is the problem to be addressed and why does it need to be solved?
- Brainstorm and list a wide variety of possible choices.
- Generate as many likely solutions as possible.
- Evaluate each choice in terms of its consequences, using predetermined standards and judgment criteria to determine the pros and cons of each alternative.
- Settle upon the best alternative. This becomes much easier once the above steps have been undertaken.
- Translate the decision into a specific action or plan of action steps.
- Carefully execute the plan.
- Evaluate the outcome of the decision and subsequent action steps. Within this process it is important to identify the lessons learned. This is an important step for further development of more effective decision making skills and judgment.
Building Block Two: Creating an Objectives Hierarchy
The first step in the process is to identify the purpose of the decision making effort: What is the problem and why does it need to be solved?
In order to achieve this end it is important to generate, record and display an objectives hierarchy by creating a list in outline format. (Software applications are also available that allow individuals or groups to create organizational charts that work well in generating visually appealing objectives hierarchies.)
In establishing an objectives hierarchy it is essential to gather as much information as possible to identify the factors involved in the problem.
Objectives should flow from “Why?” at higher levels to “How?” at lower levels. Higher-level objectives tend to be broad, inclusive, and even ambiguous, lower-level objectives more specific, which are mapped to real or actual organizational and workplace attributes or characteristics.
The objectives hierarchy should be inclusive, representing a mix of stakeholder views, and not make value judgments in respect to one objective over another.
Building Block Three: Designing Alternatives
For each objective or group of objectives within the hierarchy, it is important to identify the types of actions that would yield the optimal effect.
When designing alternatives, various objectives should have been detailed and considered within the hierarchy. With enough specificity, some may be flagged for specific action or categorized as activity-driven.
Designing alternatives tends to occur in two phases: identifying the principles by which to judge the alternatives—i.e. the standards solutions should meet—and brainstorming, or listing actual potential solutions.
Nine Steps for Identifying Alternatives:
- For each objective or group of objectives in the hierarchy, individuals identify the types of actions that would have the desired effect.
- Causal pathways among identified variables are reviewed. How might favorable interventions occur in any of these pathways?
- Two or more options for addressing each objective are defined. These may be different types of activities, different levels, strategies, or approaches for the same activity type, or modifications to ongoing related activities. If there is already a proposed action, the activities that comprise it are detailed in terms of how they align with the measured criteria in the objectives.
- Specific actions are grouped into alternatives. If there are competing objectives (perhaps reflecting different stakeholder values), alternatives can be developed that favor different groupings of objectives. In other words, different balances are sought among objectives in each alternative.
- Conversely, the same balance of objectives by different groupings of actions can be striven for.
- If based on the effects analysis a revision of alternatives is needed, it is wise to look for simple adjustments first. If major revisions are needed, the objectives hierarchy and decision making model should be revisited to determine whether erroneous or inconsistent logic led to problems.
- An open mind should be maintained, with preconceptions about what is the “best choice” not allowed to limit any or all solution options.
- For each alternative, specifics as to how, where, what, and when actions will occur should be outlined. Here it is important to make detailed assumptions about each modeled action early and explicitly in order to minimize confusion when placing this information into a structured decision making model.
- Results are recorded and activities plotted on a decision making map where appropriate.
Building Block Four: Evaluating Each Choice
For each alternative, it is best to be as specific as possible in terms of how, where, what, and when actions will occur.
An analysis of effects may suggest modification of one or more alternatives or the creation of additional alternatives. If the latter is the case it will be prudent to return to the first stage of the process.
It is important to apply standards and judgment criteria (a set of indicators) to determine the pros and cons of each alternative. When the best alternative is identified, a process overview of the selected option is conducted.
During this decision making and planning arena, it is important to make certain that an action or set of actions is specifically geared toward achieving the objectives identified.
Within the evaluation or overview stage, further details can come to light that can either be added to particular action steps or grouped into a different set of alternatives.
Excerpt: Intelligent Decision Making: Pinpoint Management Skill Development Training Series (Majorium Business Press, 2011) $ 18.95 USD
Timothy F. Bednarz, Ph.D. | Author | Publisher | Majorium Business Press
Author of Great! What Makes Leaders Great: What They Did, How They Did It and What You Can Learn From It (Finalist – 2011 Foreword Reviews‘ Book of the Year)
Linkedin | Facebook | Twitter | Web| Blog | Catalog |800.654.4935 | 715.342.1018
Copyright © 2013 Timothy F. Bednarz, All Rights Reserved
Written by Timothy F. Bednarz, Ph.D.
September 26, 2013 at 10:08 am
Subscribe to comments with RSS.